Korean inventions filed in the US rose 46%
KR → US+46%KR → JP+38%KR → EP+24%KR → CN+17%CN → US+12%EP → KR+9%EP → US+8%CN → JP+7%CN → KR+6%CN → EP+6%EP → JP+5%JP → KR+4%JP → US+2%US → KR+2%US → JP+1%US → EP-1%JP → EP-2%JP → CN-3%US → CN-5%EP → CN-9%
152Kpatent families in the busiest corridorCN→US
+46%the fastest-growing corridorKR→US
25%of CN → US work goes to ten firms in the USCN→US
Corridors
Firms sending work from Europe
| # | Firm | Share | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▲2 | Boehmert & Boehmert | 705 | 2.6% | +0.72 | 46 | 8 | |
| 2 | · | Lavoix | 687 | 2.5% | +0.65 | 69 | 9 | |
| 3 | ▲2 | Gill Jennings & Every LLP | 626 | 2.3% | +0.53 | 54 | 5 | |
| 4 | ▼3 | Grünecker Patent- und Rechtsanwälte PartG mbB | 611 | 2.2% | +0.19 | 92 | 8 | |
| 5 | ▲12 | Murgitroyd & Company | 560 | 2.0% | +1.01 | 109 | 15 | |
| 6 | ▲23 | Gulde & Partner | 497 | 1.8% | +1.12 | 45 | 11 | |
| 7 | · | HGF | 485 | 1.8% | +0.36 | 95 | 10 | |
| 8 | ▼4 | Hoffmann Eitle | 413 | 1.5% | -0.33 | 80 | 9 | |
| 9 | ▲10 | Nokia EPO representatives | 405 | 1.5% | +0.48 | 15 | 5 | |
| 10 | ▲18 | Novagraaf | 390 | 1.4% | +0.72 | 57 | 5 | |
+1,180 ranked firmsFull table | ||||||||
Families each firm handled, 2020–2022. Arrows show the rank change since 2017–2019.
Technology
| Overall | AHuman necessities | BOperations and transport | CChemistry and metallurgy | DTextiles and paper | EFixed constructions | FMechanical engineering | GPhysics | HElectricity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boehmert & Boehmert | #1 | 6 | 8 | 1 | |||||
| Lavoix | #2 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 2 | ||
| Gill Jennings & Every LLP | #3 | 9 | 2 | 1 | |||||
| Grünecker Patent- und Rechtsanwälte PartG mbB | #4 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 6 | ||||
| Murgitroyd & Company | #5 | 1 | 4 | 5 | |||||
| Hoffmann Eitle | #8 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
| Nokia EPO representatives | #9 | 3 | |||||||
| Vossius & Partner Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte mbB | Top 5% | 1 | 9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Dehns | Top 5% | 3 | 7 | ||||||
| Mewburn Ellis LLP | Top 5% | 3 | 5 | 2 | |||||
| Marks & Clerk | Top 5% | 2 | |||||||
| Cabinet Beau de Loménie | Top 5% | 2 | 7 | 6 | |||||
| Rolls-Royce plc | Top 5% | 1 | |||||||
| Ter Meer Steinmeister | Top 5% | 10 | 2 | 4 | |||||
| Evonik Patent Association | Top 5% | 1 | |||||||
| Ruttensperger Lachnit Trossin Gomoll | Top 10% | 2 | |||||||
| IFP Energies nouvelles | Top 10% | 2 | |||||||
| Patentwerk B.V. | Top 10% | 5 | 3 | ||||||
| Latscha Schöllhorn Partner AG | Top 25% | 3 |
Rank in each IPC section, by patent families 2020–2022. Overall: rank in the whole corridor, shown as a band beyond 10th.
Applicants
| # | Applicant | Families | Offices per family |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV | 1,266 | 2.68 |
| 2 | NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY | 732 | 1.65 |
| 3 | SIEMENS AG | 644 | 2.04 |
| 4 | NICOVENTURES TRADING LTD | 297 | 3.08 |
| 5 | EVONIK OPERATIONS GMBH | 287 | 3.24 |
| 6 | JT INT SA | 266 | 2.99 |
| 7 | FRAUNHOFER GES FORSCHUNG | 265 | 2.54 |
| 8 | EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD | 238 | 1.70 |
| 9 | OREAL | 218 | 2.72 |
| 10 | ROLLS ROYCE PLC | 214 | 1.14 |
+2,991 ranked applicants | |||
Top 10 by patent families filed abroad, 2020–2022.
Method
| Measure | What it counts | Minimum |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | Families a firm handled in the corridor | 10 families |
| Momentum | Change in market share since the previous period | 10 families |
| Breadth | Firms on the other side it worked with | 10 families, 3 partners |
| Openness | Partners that are new in the last two years | 10 families, 3 partners |
| Reach | Other IP5 offices an applicant files in, per family | 100 families |
SourcesPublished records of the IP5 offices and EUIPO
PeriodsPatents: 2020–2022 vs 2017–2019, by priority year. Trademarks: 2023–2025 vs 2020–2022, by filing year.
Not rankedIndividuals, in-house IP teams, applicant–firm pairs
Ranks come from the data only. Subscriptions, payments and partnerships never change a rank.
Corrections close on December 2, 2026. The corrected edition is 2026.1.No corrections yetReport an error