Analysis jurisdiction: US
Yearly family counts
11
Foreign Associates
7
Observed firm relationship shares
Outbound share
45%
Inbound share
55%
Smaller / larger direction
83.33%
Observed volume trend
N/A
Insufficient comparable years
2023–2026 are preliminary while filings publish; trends use complete years.
Shares cover only observed cross-border relationships with identifiable firms on both sides, not all foreign filing work. Missing or unlinked representatives are outside this denominator.
Outbound share = outbound ÷ (outbound + inbound) × 100. Inbound share = inbound ÷ (outbound + inbound) × 100. Rounded shares add to 100%; no observations is N/A.
These are filing-based associations, not confirmed instructions or work returned by a partner. Counts and direction can contain gaps or errors.
Smaller / larger direction = smaller flow ÷ larger flow × 100. One-way exchange is 0%; no activity is N/A. It describes observed balance, not who chose the partner.
Each patent family is counted once per firm, filing office and year. Counts are added across the selected years, so the same family can be counted again in another office or year. The total counts each family once within a firm, office and year, even if it appears in both directions. Outbound plus inbound can exceed the total. These are not application counts.
These relationship metrics cover observed cross-border filings with identifiable representatives on both sides in the served sources. IP5 support does not mean every filing or representative is captured.
US representative evidence is limited to granted documents in the source; pre-grant filings without that evidence are absent from counsel relationships. This is a counsel-evidence limit, not a cutoff for corridor filing volume.
No observed relationship is not proof that the firms have never worked together. Missing representative evidence and unlinked identities can leave gaps.
6 inbound5 outbound
Two-way exchange
Each patent family is counted once per firm, filing office and year. Counts are added across the selected years, so the same family can be counted again in another office or year.
These relationship metrics cover observed cross-border filings with identifiable representatives on both sides in the served sources. IP5 support does not mean every filing or representative is captured.
US representative evidence is limited to granted documents in the source; pre-grant filings without that evidence are absent from counsel relationships. This is a counsel-evidence limit, not a cutoff for corridor filing volume.
No observed relationship is not proof that the firms have never worked together. Missing representative evidence and unlinked identities can leave gaps.
People recorded for this firm in patent and trademark sources. A listing is not proof of current employment or a trademark qualification, and the same person can appear under name variants. Filing-year filters do not apply to the roster.
Loading people…
These are family counts. With full access, recent periods show individual applications.
Each patent family counts as one connection per partner firm per year. A family linked to two partner firms in the same year counts as two connections.
Percentages use all 13 partner connections in the selected period, including corridors below.
Loading firm overview…
Compare activity and exchange using the same filing period.
See something that needs correction? Let us know.
Technology areas
Description
Cesari and McKenna LLP is an intellectual property law firm. Since 1966, it has served corporations, universities, institutions and startups in patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret prosecution, litigation, transactions, licensing and counseling, drawing on technical expertise in engineering, science and complex technologies.
Website
https://www.c-m.com/Trademarks
Cesari and McKenna · US · 5 observed families, 2022–2026